Crops ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1): 88-95.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2018.01.014

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Influence of Open-Top Chamber on Growth and Yield of Winter Wheat

Cao Jiachen1,2,Zheng Youfei1,3,Zhao Hui3,Xu Jingxin3   

  1. 1 Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Atmospheric Environment and Equipment Technology, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, Jiangsu, China
    2 School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, Jiangsu, China;
    3 School of Atmospheric Physics, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, Jiangsu, China;
  • Received:2017-08-22 Revised:2017-12-20 Online:2018-02-20 Published:2018-08-24

RichHTML

2

PDF (PC)

143

Abstract:

In order to find out the difference in the growth and yield of winter wheat between inside and outside the open-top chamber (OTC), this paper analyzed the difference of meteorological factors inside and outside OTC and measured the plant height, leaf area, dry matter, growth parameter and yield index of winter wheat (Yangmai 13) inside OTC (CK) and outside OTC(AA) at different growth stages. The results showed that the temperature, relative humidity and vapor pressure in OTC were higher than those ouside of the chamber, and the photosynthetically active radiation was lower than that ouside of the chamber. In addition, OTC had different effects on plant height, leaf area, biomass and yield of winter wheat. Compared with AA group, OTC had an inhibitory effect on the plant height, but promoted the leaf area at the later stage during the growth period. OTC had a significant negative effect on dry weight and stem weight during the whole growth period, but it could promote the dry weight of roots. The dry matter accumulation of CK was lower than that of AA. The spike weight, grain number per plant,grain weight per plant and 1000-grain weight inside OTC were lower than those outside OTC, which resulted in the decrease of winter wheat yield inside OTC. In general, OTC had an inhibitory effect on winter wheat growth.

Key words: Open-top chamber, Winter wheat, Growth, Yield

Fig.1

The design of open-top chamber"

Fig.2

The daily change of meteorological factors inside and outside OTC"

Fig.3

The variation of the meteorological factors inside and outside OTC"

Table 1

The difference of plant height inside and outside the OTC in different growth stages cm"

处理Treatment 拔节期Jointing 孕穗期Booting 抽穗期Heading 扬花1期1st blooming 扬花2期2nd blooming 灌浆期Filling 乳熟期Milking
AA 65.13 72.83 84.77 86.07 86.27 92.47 88.70
CK 63.60 69.87 82.10 85.13 86.13 90.60 84.40

Table 2

The difference of leaf area inside and outside OTC in different growth stages cm2"

处理Treatment 拔节期Jointing 孕穗期Booting 抽穗期Heading 扬花1期1st blooming 扬花2期2nd blooming 灌浆期Filling 乳熟期Milking
AA 25.182 32.310 33.826 35.067 36.117 32.7791 26.251
CK 21.761 28.893 30.831 30.937 33.793 33.241 29.4611

Table 3

The difference of dry matter weight per plant inside and outside OTC in different growth stages g"

器官
Organ		 处理
Treatment		 拔节期
Jointing		 孕穗期
Booting		 抽穗期
Heading		 扬花1期
1st blooming		 扬花2期
2nd blooming		 灌浆期
Filling		 乳熟期
Milking
叶 Leaf AA 0.340 0.470 0.513 0.543 0.433 0.403 0.343
CK 0.300 0.353 0.460 0.490 0.390 0.343 0.270
茎Stem AA 0.430 1.013 1.123 1.767 2.370 1.910 1.616
CK 0.380 0.506 0.927 1.457 1.487 1.397 1.250
根Root AA 0.123 0.150 0.070 1.433 1.187 0.110 0.146
CK 0.107 0.047 0.103 0.080 0.093 0.077 0.106
穗Spike AA 0.167 0.323 0.550 1.157 1.747 2.253
CK 0.110 0.316 0.447 0.873 1.323 1.893

Table 4

The comparison of winter wheat dry matter distribution index of different organs in different growth stages"

器官
Organ		 处理
Treatment		 拔节期
Jointing		 孕穗期
Booting		 抽穗期
Heading		 扬花1期
1st blooming		 扬花2期
2nd blooming		 灌浆期
Filling		 乳熟期
Milking
根Root AA 0.138a 0.083a 0.034b 0.048a 0.044a 0.026a 0.033a
CK 0.136a 0.046b 0.057a 0.032b 0.033b 0.024a 0.030a
茎Stem AA 0.481a 0.553a 0.563a 0.583a 0.572a 0.458a 0.371a
CK 0.483a 0.498b 0.513b 0.589a 0.523b 0.446a 0.355a
叶Leaf AA 0.381a 0.261b 0.254a 0.183b 0.105b 0.097a 0.079a
CK 0.381a 0.348a 0.255a 0.198a 0.137a 0.109a 0.077a
穗Spike AA 0a 0.093b 0.159b 0.186a 0.279a 0.419a 0.517b
CK 0a 0.108a 0.175a 0.181b 0.307a 0.421a 0.538a

Table 5

The difference of the yield of winter wheat inside and outside OTC"

处理
Treatment		 穗重(g)
Spike weight		 穗粒数
Seeds per spike		 有效穗数(个)
Number of productive spike		 千粒重(g)
1000-seed weight		 空秕率(%)
Empty-unfilled grain rate		 产量(g/m2)
Yield
AA 3.74a 52.70a 506a 47.7a 0.98a 1 271.9a
CK 2.68a 49.24a 481b 39.3b 3.26b 930.8b

Table 6

The difference of stomatal conductance inside and outside OTC in different growth stages mmol/(m2·s)"

处理
Treatment		 拔节期
Jointing		 孕穗期
Booting		 抽穗期
Heading		 扬花1期
1st blooming		 扬花2期
2nd blooming		 扬花3期
3rd blooming		 灌浆期
Filling		 乳熟期
Milking
AA 132.57 217.48 197.1 168.78 243.04 202.48 257.48 210.12
CK 110.45 184.22 158.63 149.18 165.64 161.88 227.68 183.36
[1] Heagle A S, Body D E, Heck W W . An open-top field chamber to assess the impact of air pollution on plants. Journal of Environmental Quality, 1973,2(3):365-368.
doi: 10.2134/jeq1973.00472425000200030014x
[2] Mandl R H, Weinstein L H, Mccune D C , et al. A cylindrical,open-top chamber for the exposure of plants to air pollutants in the field. Journal of Environmental Quality, 1973,2(3):371-376.
doi: 10.2134/jeq1973.00472425000200030016x
[3] Riikonen J, Syrjälä L, Tulva I , et al. Stomatal characteristics and infection biology of Pyrenopeziza betulicola in Betula pendula trees grown under elevated CO2 and O3. Environmental Pollution, 2008,156(2):536-543.
doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2008.01.008
[4] Kanerva T, Regina K, Rämö K , et al. Fluxes of N2O,CH4 and CO2 in a meadow ecosystem exposed to elevated ozone and carbon dioxide for three years. Environmental Pollution, 2007,145(3):818-828.
doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2006.03.055
[5] 王春乙, 白月明 . 臭氧和气溶胶浓度变化对农作物的影响研究. 北京: 气象出版社, 2007.
[6] 郑启伟, 王效科, 冯兆忠 , 等. 用旋转布气法开顶式气室研究臭氧对水稻生物量和产量的影响. 环境科学, 2007,1(1):170-175.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0250-3301.2007.01.031
[7] 赵天宏, 孙加伟, 赵艺欣 , 等. CO2和O3浓度升高及其复合作用对玉米(Zea mays L.)活性氧代谢及抗氧化酶活性的影响. 生态学报, 2008,28(8):3644-3653.
[8] 郑有飞, 吴荣军 . 地表臭氧变化特征及其作物响应. 北京: 气象出版社, 2012.
[9] 谭凯炎, 周广胜, 任三学 . 冬小麦叶片暗呼吸对CO2浓度和温度协同作用的响应. 科学通报, 2013(12):1158-1163.
[10] 张绪成, 于显枫, 马一凡 . 施氮和大气CO2浓度升高对小麦旗叶光合电子传递和分配的影响. 应用生态学报, 2011,22(3):673-680.
[11] Wajmde C, Wmw W, Hmlk H , et al. Physiology of yield determination of rice under elevated carbon dioxide at high temperatures in a subhumid tropical climate. Field Crops Research, 2006,96(2/3):336-347.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2005.08.002
[12] Centritto M . Photosynthetic limitations and carbon partitioning in cherry in response to water deficit and elevated [CO2]. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 2005,106(2/3):233-242.
[13] 张金恩, 肖洪, 郑有飞 , 等. 开顶式气室内外冬小麦光合特性差异比较. 生态学报, 2015,35(21):6993-7002.
doi: 10.5846/stxb201402200299
[14] Heck W W, Cure W W, Rawlings J O , et al. Assessing impacts of ozone on agricultural crops:I Overview. Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association, 1984,34(7):729-735.
doi: 10.1080/00022470.1984.10465805
[15] Olszyk D M, Bytnerowicz A, Kats G , et al. Crop effects from air pollutants in air exclusion systems vs. field chambers. Journal of Environmental Quality, 1986,15(4):417-422.
doi: 10.2134/jeq1986.00472425001500040019x
[16] Hogsett W E, Tingey D T, Holman S R . A programmable exposure control system for determination of the effects of pollutant exposure regimes on plant growth. Atmospheric Environment, 1985,19(7):1135-1145.
doi: 10.1016/0004-6981(85)90198-2
[17] Leadley P W, Drake B G . Open top chambers for exposing plant canopies to elevated CO2 concentration and for measuring net gas exchange. Vegetatio, 1993,104/105(1):3-15.
doi: 10.1007/BF00048141
[18] Persson K, Danielsson H, Selldén G , et al. The effects of tropospheric ozone and elevated carbon dioxide on potato (Solanum tuberosum,L. cv. Bintje) growth and yield. Science of the Total Environment, 2003,310(1):191-201.
doi: 10.1016/S0048-9697(02)00639-3
[19] 王春乙, 白月明, 郑昌玲 , 等. CO2和O3浓度倍增对作物影响的研究进展. 气象学报, 2004,62(6):875-881.
doi: 10.11676/qxxb2004.084
[20] 耿春梅, 杨文, 殷宝辉 , 等. 田间原位开顶式臭氧熏蒸系统研究. 环境科学研究, 2011,24(6):593-600.
[21] Lawson T, Craigon J, Black C R , et al. Effects of elevated carbon dioxide and ozone on the growth and yield of potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) grown in open-top chambers. Environmental Pollution, 2001,111(3):479-491.
doi: 10.1016/S0269-7491(00)00080-4
[22] Fuhrer J . Effects of ozone on managed pasture:I. Effects of open-top chambers on microclimate,ozone flux,and plant growth. Environmental Pollution, 1994,86(3):297-305.
doi: 10.1016/0269-7491(94)90170-8
[23] Sanders G E, Clark A G, Colls J J . The influence of open-top chambers on the growth and development of field bean. New Phytologist, 1991,117(3):439-447.
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1991.tb00008.x
[24] Sanders G E, Turnbull N D, Clark A G , et al. The growth and development of Vicia faba L. in filtered and unfiltered open-top chambers. New Phytologist, 1991,116(1):67-78.
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1990.tb00511.x
[25] 王海珍, 韩路, 徐雅丽 , 等. 不同温度下灰胡杨叶片气孔导度对光强响应的模型分析. 生态环境学报, 2015(5):741-748.
[26] 赵辉 . 臭氧胁迫下不同作物气孔吸收通量的对比及其时空分布. 南京:南京信息工程大学, 2016.
[27] Pleijel H, Danielsson H, Emberson L , et al. Ozone risk assessment for agricultural crops in Europe:Further development of stomatal flux and flux-response relationships for European wheat and potato. Atmospheric Environment, 2007,41(14):3022-3040.
doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.12.002
[28] Jones H G. Plants and Microclimate: A quantitative approach to environmental plant physiology. 2nd Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
[29] Dennett M D, Elston J, Milford J R . The effect of temperature on the growth of individual leaves of Vicia faba L. in the field. Annals of Botany, 1979,43(2):197-208.
doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a085625
[30] Karamanos A J, Elston J, Wadsworth R M . Water stress and leaf growth of field beans (Vicia faba L. ) in the field:Water potentials and laminar expansion. Annals of Botany, 1982,49(6):815-826.
doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a086308
[31] Kasim K, Dennett M D . Effects of shading and plant density on leaf growth of Vicia faba. Annals of Applied Biology, 2010,109(3):627-638.
doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1986.tb03220.x
[1] Zhao Xin, Chen Shaofeng, Wang Hui, . Research on the Yield and Quality of Different Tartaty#br# Buckwheat Varieties in Northern Shanxi Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 27-32.
[2] Wang Hanxia, Shan Fuhua, Tian Liping, Ma Qiaoyun, . Analysis of Stability and Adaptability of Winter#br# Wheat Varieties in the Regional Trials of#br# the Northern Wheat Region of China [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 40-44.
[3] Zhang Xiangyu, Li Hai, Liang Haiyan, . Effects of Different Row Spacing and Planting Density#br# on the Growth Characteristics and Yield of Millet [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 91-96.
[4] Wu Ronghua, Zhuang Kezhang, Liu Peng, Zhang Chunyan. Response of Summer Maize Yield to#br# Meteorological Factors in Lunan Region [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 104-109.
[5] Su Feifei, Zhang Jinghua, Li Yong, Liu Shangwu, Liu Zhenyu, Wang Shaopeng, Wan Shuming, Chen Xi, Gao Yunfei, Hu Linshuang, Lü Dianqiu. Effects of Different Irrigation Methods on#br# Physiological Characteristics and Water#br# Use Efficiency of Potato [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 97-103.
[6] Zhang Ruidong, Cao Xiong, Yue Zhongxiao, . Effects of Nitrogen and Density Interaction on Grain#br# Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 110-115.
[7] An Xia, Zhang Haijun, Jiang Fangshan, Lü Lianjie, Chen Jun. Effects of Different Sowing Dates and Sowing#br# Densities on the Population Structure and#br# Yield of Two Spike Type Winter Wheats [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 132-136.
[8] Gao Wenjun, Yang Guoyi, Gao Xinzhong, Yu Zhu, . The Effects of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, or Potassium#br# Fertilizer on the Yield and Silage Quality of Maize [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 144-149.
[9] Wang Xiaolin, Ji Xiaoling, Zhang Panpan, Zhang Xiong, Zhang Jing. Correlation Analysis between Aboveground Biomass#br# Allocation and Grain Yield in Different Varieties of#br# Foxtail Millet in the Dry Land of Loess Plateau [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 150-155.
[10] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121-125.
[11] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126-130.
[12] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138-142.
[13] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143-148.
[14] Huiqin Wen,Tianling Cheng,Ziyou Pei,Xue Li,Lisheng Zhang,Mei Zhu. Analysis of Comprehensive Characteristics of Wheat Varieties Registered in Shanxi Province in Recent Years [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 32-36.
[15] Menghan Wei, Huifang Xie, Lu Xing, Hui Song, Shujun Wang, Suying Wang, Haiping Liu, Nan Fu, Jinrong Liu. Comprehensive Evaluation of Yield and Agronomic Characters of Foxtail Millet Germplasms from North China [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 42-47.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .