Crops ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 134-142.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2017.04.023

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of PEG Stress on Drought Resistance at Seedling Stage of Adzuki Beans and the Establishment of Drought Resistance Identification System

Hao Xiyu1,Wang Hongdan2,Yin Zhichao3,Liang Jie1,Yin Fengxiang1,Hao Jianjun2   

  1. 1 Baicheng Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Baicheng 137000,Jilin,China
    2 School of Biological Science and Technology,Shenyang Agricultural University,Shenyang 110161,Liaoning,China
    3 College of Plant Science,Jilin University,Changchun 130062,Jilin,China
  • Received:2017-04-12 Revised:2017-07-01 Online:2017-08-15 Published:2018-08-26
  • Contact: Jianjun Hao

RichHTML

8

PDF (PC)

166

Abstract:

The drought-resistant cultivars including Baihong 3, Baihong 4, Baihong 5 and Jihong 352 as materials and PEG with different concentrations (5%, 10%, 20%) simulating water stress treatment in seedling stage of adzuki beans were used in this study. The function leaf on the third, sixth and ninth day was picked to determine drought resistance physiological indicators. The results showed that the indicators that could be used to identify the drought-resistance of adzuki bean were the SOD activity of 5% PEG treatment on the sixth day, the ABA content of 5% PEG treatment on the sixth day, the soluble sugar content of 10% PEG treatment on the sixth day, the electrical conductivity of 5% PEG treatment on the third day, the superoxide anion produce rate of 5% PEG treatment on the sixth day. The conclusion showed that Baihong 6 and Baihong 4 were both drought-resistance cultivars but Baihong 3 and Jihong 352 were less drought-resistance cultivars.

Key words: Adzuki bean, Seeding stage, Physiological index, Water stress, Drought-resistance

Table 1

Effects of PEG on SOD activity of different adzuki bean in seedling stage U/(g·h)"

品种
Cultivar		 处理后天数(d)
The days of after treatment		 对照
CK		 5%PEG处理
5%PEG treatment		 10%PEG处理
10%PEG treatment		 20%PEG处理
20%PEG treatment
BH3 3 209.4671±2.8463 155.1778±11.1877* 194.7201±18.9780 200.8397±18.3817
6 204.4266±2.7343 240.8097±6.5492* 163.2722±29.2989* 267.7708±7.8024*
9 188.9510±17.1194 151.3179±20.5139* 168.0344±24.5121 144.7581±10.6570*
BH4 3 188.8430±0.3934 212.5512±6.2515* 234.2907±20.6791* 249.2962±10.6128**
6 185.0924±9.0046 248.5793±37.9914** 220.3664±1.4740* 157.6365±3.9680
9 231.5903±16.5768 204.4819±14.4766 204.8112±3.1630 248.7730±26.9031
BH6 3 152.1572±10.6956 144.6495±21.0837 131.0072±8.7254 146.1382±6.1430
6 86.5172±20.8143 171.4747±15.8480** 161.0846±9.5873** 126.3513±0.0000*
9 151.4920±2.0927 152.6208±2.3511 159.6148±5.8287 138.8985±21.0171
JH 3 142.1069±18.8383 90.1260±9.3786* 128.7792±18.6243 144.2592±15.7399
6 99.4462±1.9758 159.5897±15.3910* 146.8714±11.7565* 162.0526±21.8594*
9 129.2765±14.1346 166.3537±4.7483* 145.6508±25.4374 135.0340±25.7760

Table 2

Effects of PEG on POD activity of different adzuki bean in seedling stage U/(g·min)"

品种
Cultivar		 处理后天数(d)
The days after treatment		 对照
CK		 5%PEG处理
5%PEG treatment		 10%PEG处理
10%PEG treatment		 20%PEG处理
20%PEG treatment
BH3 3 669.4607±32.0534 816.5082±35.7519** 844.5634±164.1243* 1 709.6340±32.1336**
6 944.6142±41.0331 1 458.2040±21.0823* 1 747.4420±55.5970** 1 717.4370±89.5941**
9 1 290.8950±48.5743 2 353.3730±60.8441** 1 822.2240±41.5332* 1 964.1530±58.1343**
BH4 3 713.5628±51.3608 813.1334±25.3332 1 209.3500±49.0023* 1 257.4260±193.0693*
6 1 109.4300±85.9260 1 383.7750±86.3887* 2 121.1230±175.9553** 2 103.9290±101.5647**
9 1 243.7140±49.9979 1 463.8031±2.6839** 1 651.9430±45.9024** 825.7638±27.3096**
BH6 3 672.3924±37.8112 1 075.4060±18.4207** 914.1072±66.2568** 1 483.5920±9.0981**
6 1 091.5310±49.2799 1 720.6720±60.8116** 1 766.7150±64.1127** 3 321.1050±118.5647**
9 1 279.3980±35.8979 2 406.4410±112.6528** 1 995.9270±76.0345** 1 915.5950±11.4213**
JH 3 790.6764±24.1842 897.2048±20.1691* 1 023.8000±41.5188** 1 533.7030±66.6677**
6 989.7014±54.0183 1 284.2290±110.6980* 2 083.7270±154.8725** 1 893.7760±87.6365**
9 1 222.1110±47.6711 1 340.1710±71.6815 2 174.8650±50.6280** 2 252.6170±136.5277**

Table 3

Effects of PEG on ABA content of different adzuki bean in seedling stage Ng/g·Fw"

品种
Cultivar		 处理后天数(d)
The days of after treatment		 对照
CK		 5%PEG处理
5%PEG treatment		 10%PEG处理
10%PEG treatment		 20%PEG处理
20%PEG treatment
BH3 3 2 100.8500±148.2395 1 227.0800±3.0055** 1 655.0720±27.7170** 2 755.4330±333.3842*
6 1 347.1590±205.9270 778.0419±62.1796* 647.5509±39.4069* 1 485.8220±256.9520
9 1 611.3770±39.5107 2 440.8650±181.9251* 3 249.8250±575.2702* 3 601.0810±133.8049**
BH4 3 1 027.1840±150.0540 2 824.3520±9.9047** 1 130.6690±28.1881 2 607.3490±251.1899**
6 161.1756±24.7874 1 760.3010±99.8748** 637.9509±30.7409** 410.4254±119.2663*
9 1 258.3460±155.2239 2 769.6230±28.4783** 2 848.5640±311.0739** 3 077.1160±394.0654**
BH6 3 809.6446±18.2296 910.8683±3.8282** 762.1882±135.9778 2 657.2630±165.9192**
6 632.5677±227.1386 1 669.4410±247.5309** 1 205.5860±174.1826* 965.5097±209.9071
9 2 152.7610±79.7255 1 935.7820±50.0916 1 741.8820±319.1856 3 585.6020±287.2455**
JH 3 177.1649±5.0752 648.8794±1.4098** 958.4502±2.1028** 2 249.6610±11.9558**
6 351.3065±17.5732 1 619.1970±104.1080** 1 104.7560±90.3621** 983.8583±98.7873**
9 2 699.2700±27.6832 2 359.9380±225.1262 2 752.9020±150.6624 5 393.9120±754.3244**

Table 4

Effects of PEG on soluble sugar content of different adzuki bean in seedling stage %"

品种
Cultivar		 处理后天数(d)
The days of after treatment		 对照
CK		 5%PEG处理
5%PEG treatment		 10%PEG处理
10%PEG treatment		 20%PEG处理
20%PEG treatment
BH3 3 2.7659±0.0352 3.2933±0.1098** 2.8417±0.1845 4.2388±0.0585**
6 2.3396±0.3172 2.4559±0.2408 3.2516±0.0983* 5.6213±0.0231**
9 4.4259±1.0191 3.8302±0.1202 3.1022±0.1895* 3.7034±0.1646
BH4 3 3.0655±0.1908 2.9458±0.1322 2.6507±0.0640* 3.4349±0.3005*
6 2.0265±0.0329 2.2695±0.6243 4.1954±0.0917** 6.4368±0.3261**
9 6.7551±1.5043 5.1418±0.3036* 4.4948±0.0871* 4.3183±0.3905*
BH6 3 3.1182±0.1908 2.5287±0.1038* 2.7812±0.0676* 2.9971±0.1902
6 2.0807±0.1788 2.6683±0.7653 3.3385±0.1384* 3.6029±0.0511*
9 3.3951±0.0224 3.0882±0.0796* 3.6827±0.2172* 3.7548±0.1629*
JH 3 2.8258±0.1199 2.7313±0.0606 3.4111±0.3140* 3.6270±0.1734*
6 2.3380±0.1846 2.7217±0.5721 3.2323±0.1516* 4.3383±0.3260**
9 3.4199±0.4897 4.3833±0.2201** 3.6036±0.1032 3.9701±0.0000*

Table 5

Effects of PEG on MDA content of different adzuki bean in seedling stage nmol/g"

品种
Cultivar		 处理后天数(d)
The days of after treatment		 对照
CK		 5%PEG处理
5%PEG treatment		 10%PEG处理
10%PEG treatment		 20%PEG处理
20%PEG treatment
BH3 3 21.7605±0.8478 20.0989±0.8814 19.7361±1.4952 31.1533±1.1950**
6 31.8538±1.7966 30.0016±1.0715 26.3886±0.6059* 33.7942±1.0241
9 32.6741±2.3629 30.1034±4.3906 30.4844±1.1389 32.2909±1.3137
BH4 3 23.2361±1.5525 27.4701±2.3455* 17.8709±1.6886* 27.5671±0.9221*
6 29.1395±4.6508 21.3543±4.1138* 34.3946±1.9222 19.5738±2.8550*
9 27.2298±2.6975 25.0627±1.6173 26.6464±2.5250 26.8870±5.1578
BH6 3 24.8503±0.3068 25.2697±0.5852 29.3818±1.7590* 28.8575±1.5906*
6 29.6741±3.8452 24.4033±0.6927* 26.4576±1.2531 24.1422±1.2456*
9 29.9255±1.0973 29.1734±1.9957 28.3136±1.9809 25.3335±1.3580*
JH 3 29.6140±0.6444 30.5791±0.3185 37.4831±3.0639* 34.6157±7.0842
6 28.0198±0.7722 37.0707±1.9111** 32.5315±1.5175* 26.5262±0.5342
9 43.9681±1.7816 42.9565±0.2789 40.3243±1.6394* 41.2091±1.5021*

Table 6

Effects of PEG on relative electric conductivity of different adzuki bean in seedling stage %"

品种
Cultivar		 处理后天数(d)
The days of after treatment		 对照
CK		 5%PEG处理
5%PEG treatment		 10%PEG处理
10%PEG treatment		 20%PEG处理
20%PEG treatment
BH3 3 10.8463±2.3192 6.7481±0.7416* 2.4209±0.8775** 3.8629±0.0286**
6 8.9370±2.6676 5.6232±1.2408 2.5567±4.0876** 5.8012±1.7782
9 6.0982±0.2475 5.3524±1.4591 7.2823±2.5553 10.1222±2.9359*
BH4 3 8.5270±0.6610 4.7164±1.1247* 3.0461±0.7166* 3.8522±1.8803*
6 11.6379±2.3651 4.0962±0.2142* 4.5183±0.5400* 24.9411±6.2024*
9 5.7667±1.6149 3.0853±0.7584 8.6574±4.6170 9.1369±0.8324
BH6 3 7.5184±0.2030 4.8940±0.6005* 2.7208±0.8222** 6.4064±1.6796
6 5.4259±0.6087 4.2957±1.2036 3.7440±0.2356* 14.9121±0.5540**
9 5.7393±2.2537 6.0981±0.7395 3.9793±0.7688 7.8652±2.1686
JH 3 9.0817±1.3497 6.4634±0.3537* 4.1015±0.6174** 6.4549±1.0952*
6 4.8730±1.3660 3.4424±0.5934 4.4968±0.3912 15.0880±0.1867*
9 5.7671±2.2777 4.5557±1.1841 4.8623±2.7127 9.0253±0.4168

Table 7

Effects of PEG on O2-· product rate of different adzuki bean in seedling stage nmol/(g·min)"

品种
Cultivar		 处理后天数(d)
The days of after treatment		 对照
CK		 5%PEG处理
5%PEG treatment		 10%PEG处理
10%PEG treatment		 20%PEG处理
20%PEG treatment
BH3 3 6.8862±0.2433 6.5553±0.1675 6.7508±0.2726 6.9182±0.1090
6 6.6025±0.0815 9.2417±0.3278* 10.3100±0.4340** 13.6347±0.2188**
9 7.8150±0.0900 11.2547±0.2417** 8.7460±0.1546** 11.2746±0.2053**
BH4 3 8.7751±0.4516 7.8602±1.0144 6.3302±0.0688* 7.4489±0.1797*
6 6.3709±0.0373 8.0933±0.2004** 14.3207±0.9337** 14.4628±0.2881**
9 8.6537±0.2253 9.2629±0.0814* 11.1661±0.2419** 17.5643±0.1044**
BH6 3 9.4807±0.2353 7.3479±0.4774** 6.0421±0.2452** 6.9413±0.1893**
6 7.5731±0.0705 8.9099±0.4593* 14.1430±0.6850** 14.3759±0.1438*
9 8.0628±0.0505 10.6628±0.1815** 9.0768±0.1424** 11.5582±0.3133**
JH 3 6.6864±0.1144 6.5879±0.4716 5.7940±0.2848* 5.9760±0.0936*
6 6.6782±0.1120 8.8939±0.1328* 11.7599±0.6501** 14.3341±0.2086**
9 10.4811±0.1990 9.5870±0.1604** 13.0856±0.0290** 9.1546±0.0743**

Table 8

Changes of the physiological indexes of the resistance to drought compared with the control in the seedling stage of adzuki beans"

指标Index 处理Treatment BH3 BH4 BH6 JH
SOD活性SOD activity CK 204.43 185.09 86.52 99.45
处理Treatment 240.81 248.58 171.47 159.59
△% 17.80 34.30 98.19 60.47
ABA含量ABA content CK 1347.16 161.18 632.57 351.31
处理Treatment 778.04 1 760.30 1 669.44 1 619.20
△% -42.25 992.13 163.91 360.90
可溶性糖含量Soluble sugar content CK 2.34 2.03 2.08 2.34
处理Treatment 3.25 4.20 3.34 3.23
△% 38.89 106.90 60.58 38.03
相对电导率Relative electric conductivity CK 10.85 8.53 7.52 9.08
处理Treatment 6.75 4.72 4.90 6.46
△% -37.79 -44.67 -19.70 -28.85
O2-·产生速率O2-·product rate CK 6.60 6.37 7.57 6.68
处理Treatment 9.24 8.09 8.91 8.89
△% 40.00 27.00 17.70 33.08

Table 9

The drought resistance level of adzuki bean in seedling stage"

品种
Cultivar		 SOD活性
SOD activity		 ABA含量
ABA content		 可溶性糖含量
Contents of soluble sugar		 相对电导率
Relative conductivity		 O2-·产生速率
O2-·producing rate		 抗旱级数
Drought resisting series
BH3 1 1 2 3 1 8
BH4 2 4 4 4 3 17
BH6 4 2 3 1 4 14
JH 3 3 1 2 2 11
[1] 周显青 . 食用豆类加工与利用技术.北京: 化学工业出版社, 2003.
[2] Hori Y, Sato S, Hatai A . Antibacterial activity of plant extracts from azuki beans (Vignaangularis) in vitro. Phytotherapy Research, 2006,20(2):162-164.
doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1573
[3] Sato S, Hori Y, Yamate J , et al. Protective effect of dietary adzuki bean (Vignaangularis) seed coats against renal interstitial fibrosis of rats induced by cisplatin. Nutrition, 2005,21(4):504-511.
doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2004.07.019
[4] 王述民, 曹永生 , Redden R J, 等. 我国小豆种质资源形态多样性鉴定与分类研究. 作物学报, 2002,28(6):727-733.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2002.06.002
[5] 王瑾, 刘桂茹, 杨学举 , 等. PEG胁迫下不同抗旱性小麦品种幼苗形态及主要理化特性的比较. 河北农业大学学报, 2007,28(5):6-10.
[6] Atree S M, Fowke L C . Embryogeny of gymnosperms: advances in synthetic seed technology of conifers.Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 1993,35(1):1-35.
doi: 10.1007/BF00043936
[7] 张盼盼, 冯佰利, 王鹏科 , 等. PEG胁迫下糜子苗期抗旱指标鉴选研究. 中国农业大学学报, 2012,17(1):53-59.
[8] 郭数进, 李贵全 . 大豆生理指标与抗旱性关系的研究. 河南农业科学, 2009,38(6):38-41.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3268.2009.06.010
[9] 郝建军, 黄春花, 卢环 , 等. 不同小豆品种抗旱生理指标比较的研究.辽宁农业科学, 2012(5):21-25.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1728.2012.05.005
[10] 郝建军, 康宗利, 于洋 . 植物生理学实验技术.北京: 化学工业出版社, 2007.
[11] 刘学义 . 大豆抗旱性评定方法探讨.北京: 中国学术期刊电子杂志出版社, 1986.
[12] 汪耀富, 韩锦峰, 林学梧 . 烤烟生长前期对干旱胁迫的生理生化响应研究. 作物学报, 1996,22(1):117-121.
[13] 刘世鹏, 曹娟云, 刘冲 , 等. 水分胁迫对绿豆幼苗渗透调节物质的影响. 延安大学学报(自然科学版), 2008,27(1):55-58.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-602X.2008.01.020
[14] 李楠, 黄佳丽, 曲波 , 等. 干旱胁迫对委陵菜膜脂过氧化作用及保护酶活性的影响. 中国草地学报, 2011,33(4):73-77.
[15] Daie J, Campbell W F . Response of tomato plants to stressful temperatures. Plant Physiology, 1981,67(1):26-29.
doi: 10.1104/pp.67.1.26
[16] Ti-Da G E, Sui F G, Bai L P , et al. Effects of water stress on the protective enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation in roots and leaves of summer maize. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2006,5(4):291-298.
[17] Dhindsa R S, Dhindsa P L, Thorpe T A . Leaf senescence:Correlated with increased level of membrane permeability lipid peroxidation and decreased superoxide dismutase and catalase. Journal of Experimental Botany, 1981,32(1):93-101.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/32.1.93
[18] 陈郡雯, 吴卫, 郑有良 , 等 .聚乙二醇(PEG-6000)模拟干旱条件下白芷苗期抗旱性研究. 中国中药杂志, 2010,35(2):149-154.
[19] 谭晓荣, 吴兴泉, 戴媛 , 等. 小麦幼苗叶片活性氧清除能力对干旱胁迫的响应. 河南农业科学, 2007,36(1):27-30.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3268.2007.01.008
[1] Jingwen Fang,Yan Wu,Zhihua Liu. Effects of Salt Stress on Seed Germination and Physiological Characteristics of Apocynum venetum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 167-174.
[2] Xiaoyong Zhang,Youlian Yang,Shujiang Li,Rongchuan Xiong,Hong Xiang. Effects of Exogenous GA3 and 6-BA on Leaf Senescence in Low Temperature Stress of Virus-Free Potato Cutting Seedlings [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 95-101.
[3] Mingcong Zhang,Yingce Zhan,Songyu He,Xijun Jin,Mengxue Wang,Chunyuan Ren,Yuxian Zhang. Effects of Different Nitrogen Fertilizer and Density Level on Dry Matter Accumulation and Yield of Adzuki Bean [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 141-146.
[4] Chang Liu,Xuemei Li,Jiayuan Tan,Xiaomin Liang,Xuemei Li. Effects of Water Stress Simulated by PEG on Content of Mineral Elements in Rice Seedlings [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(5): 162-167.
[5] Zhenxing Liu,Guimei Zhou,Jian Chen,Zhi Ma. Control Effect of Different Chemicles on Adzuki Beans Mosaic Virus Disease [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(4): 165-168.
[6] ,Lili Zhang,Ying Shi. Screening of Drought Resistant Germplasm Resources in Potato [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(4): 72-77.
[7] Ning Yang,Botong Zhao,Yuzhuo Bao,Yan Lü,Kankan Peng,Yu Tian,Junhong Wang,Jing Meng,Jing Cang. Effects of Exogenous ABA and Its Inhibitor Fluridone on Cold Resistance Indicators of Winter Wheat Tiller Node [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(4): 117-122.
[8] Wenwen Ji,Zeyan Zhang,Yaowen Zhang,Daizhen Sun. Identification of Drought Resistance of Adzuki Bean Germplasm Resources from Different Places in Budding Stage [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(3): 54-59.
[9] Jianhua Guo,Song Yu,Lihe Yu,Wei Guo,Yingwen Xue,Shanshan Jin,Haiyun Liang,Junjun Duan. Effects of Cropping Pattern and Density on Yield and Dry Matter Accumulation of Adzuki Bean [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(1): 113-118.
[10] Xuemei Li,Chang Liu,Qianwen Liu,Yudi Zhang,Xuemei Li. The Effects of PEG Pretreatment on the Isozymes and Expression of Antioxidant Enzymes in Rice Leaves under Water Stress [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(6): 107-111.
[11] Jiao Wang,Yongqing Zhang. Observation on Growth Pattern of Root System in Different Adzuki Bean Varieties under Drought Stress [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(6): 112-119.
[12] Chunming Zhang,Xueyin Zhao,Hubin Yan,Huijun Zhu,Zeyan Zhang,Yaowen Zhang. Photosynthetic Characteristics of Different Adzuki Cultivars under Intercropping Patterns [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(6): 67-72.
[13] Cuicui Yang,Fade Li,Yan Li,Chenglai Wu,Chunqing Zhang. Effects of Arc-Tooth-Shaped Corona Discharge Field Treatment on Improving Corn Seed Vigor and Physiological Indexes [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(6): 154-159.
[14] Lirong Bai,Liran Shi,Xiaoli Guo,Xiaona Zhang. Effects of Water Stress on Physiological Characteristics of Different Genotypes of Triticale and Rye Seedlings [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(4): 118-122.
[15] Hezheng Wang,Huan Liu,Bei Li,Chenglong Sun,Bingbing Yin,Jun Zhang,Xinzhi Bao. Effects of Exogenous Substances on Physiological Characteristics in Wheat after Anthesis under Water Stress [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(3): 139-143.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .