Crops ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 26-31.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2021.01.004

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Grey Relational Grade Evaluation of 19 Oat Varieties Introduced in Ali of Tibet

Zhou Qilong()   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Hulless Barley and Yak Germplasm Resources and Genetic Improvement/Institute of Pratacultural Sciences, Tibet Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Lhasa 850000, Tibet, China
  • Received:2020-04-15 Revised:2020-06-10 Online:2021-02-15 Published:2021-02-23

RichHTML

5

PDF (PC)

233

Abstract:

Based on the shortage of artificial forage in Ali area, nineteen oat varieties were assessed. Nutritional traits and agronomic traits were determined and analyzed by conventional analysis, and the comprehensive evaluation was carried out by grey relational analysis method. The results showed that the Baler 2 had the highest hay yield (7 086.49kg/ha), the highest flag leaf length (23.87cm) and the highest RFQ (243.72), Qinghai 444 was the highest flag leaf width (13.54mm) and the highest stem diameter (10.00mm), Everleaf had the highest leaf and stem ratio (0.87), Souris was the best in plant height (99.71cm). The ranges of tiller number, spike length, spike width, spikelet number, spikelet weight, crude protein and ether extract contents of different varieties were 2.2-3.3, 10.30-30.99cm, 1.83-9.99cm, 0.43-1.21g, 2.3-6.5, 1.68%-3.20% and 5.00%-7.35%, respectively. The grey relational analysis results showed that Baler 2, Monida, Baiyan No.7 and Forage plus were more suitable for planting in Ali region.

Key words: Ali, Oat, Grey correlation analysis, Comprehensive evaluation

Table 1

The varieties and their sources"

编号Number 品种Variety 来源Source
1 燕王 北京正道生态科技有限公司
2 甜燕麦 青海省畜牧兽医科学院
3 太阳神 北京正道生态科技有限公司
4 青引2号 青海省畜牧兽医科学院
5 青引1号 青海省畜牧兽医科学院
6 青燕1号 青海省畜牧兽医科学院
7 青海444 青海省畜牧兽医科学院
8 牧王 北京正道生态科技有限公司
9 牧乐思 克劳沃生态科技有限公司
10 魅力 北京正道生态科技有限公司
11 美达 北京正道生态科技有限公司
12 领袖 北京正道生态科技有限公司
13 林纳 青海省畜牧兽医科学院
14 加燕2号 青海省畜牧兽医科学院
15 海威 克劳沃生态科技有限公司
16 贝勒2 北京正道生态科技有限公司
17 贝勒1 北京正道生态科技有限公司
18 白燕7号 青海省畜牧兽医科学院
19 爱沃 北京正道生态科技有限公司

Table 2

The properties of different oat varieties"

编号Number 干草产量
Hay yield
(kg/hm2)		 叶茎比
Leaf-stem
ratio		 旗叶长
Flag leaf length (cm)		 旗叶宽
Flag leaf width (mm)		 株高
Plant height
(cm)		 茎粗
Stem diameter (mm)		 穗长
Spike length (cm)		 穗宽
Spike width (cm)		 小穗数
Spikelet
number		 穗重
Panicle
weight (g)		 分蘖数
Tiller
number		 粗脂肪含量
EE content (%)		 粗蛋白含量
CP content (%)
1 6 140.44±568.77abcd 0.46±0.07cd 18.73±0.97bcde 10.46±0.65b 91.34±4.47abc 5.37±0.30cdefg 20.56±1.46c 5.37±0.30abc 3.10±0.50bc 1.04±0.19abc 2.60±0.40a 2.10±0.41a 6.84±0.57a
2 6 590.64±413.74ab 0.27±0.04efgh 22.07±2.18ab 5.90±0.50de 89.41±4.23abcd 4.79±0.42defgh 18.37±1.89cd 4.79±0.42abcd 3.20±0.47bc 0.82±0.12abcd 2.80±0.36a 2.34±0.84a 6.12±0.66a
3 4 276.80±811.91cdef 0.22±0.04fgh 16.74±2.41cdef 6.45±0.76cde 96.97±4.30a 3.74±0.44ghi 18.89±1.35cd 3.74±0.44cd 3.20±0.59bc 0.71±0.12bcd 2.80±0.39a 3.00±0.65a 6.76±0.72a
4 3 249.86±816.08fg 0.22±0.03fgh 16.63±0.56cdefg 2.40±0.26f 79.18±5.64cdefg 1.83±0.19i 14.53±0.58def 1.83±0.19e 3.10±0.23bc 0.47±0.06d 2.30±0.30a 2.77±0.90a 6.08±0.71a
5 5 156.09±640.49abcdef 0.31±0.04defg 18.16±1.25bcdef 8.67±0.77bc 81.43±3.23bcdefg 4.89±0.59cdefgh 18.11±1.35cd 4.89±0.59abc 3.30±0.52bc 0.62±0.17cd 2.30±0.30a 2.20±0.36a 5.92±0.44a
6 3 234.68±162.69fg 0.15±0.02h 12.54±0.93gh 6.47±0.71cde 74.72±3.67efg 5.47±0.47bcde 17.63±1.00cde 5.47±0.47abc 2.60±0.22c 0.79±0.16abcd 2.70±0.37a 2.89±0.60a 6.82±0.74a
7 5 707.15±583.43abcde 0.19±0.01gh 13.21±1.46fgh 13.54±1.18a 91.26±3.36abc 10.00±0.55a 15.10±1.45def 9.99±0.55a 2.60±0.27c 0.88±0.24abcd 2.90±0.38a 2.41±0.28a 6.21±0.47a
8 4 806.97±641.09bcdef 0.41±0.04cde 14.80±0.99defgh 7.89±0.81bcd 88.43±5.44abcde 6.46±0.66b 18.29±1.36cd 6.46±0.66b 3.10±0.43bc 0.84±0.19abcd 2.90±0.53a 2.31±0.83a 5.00±0.70a
9 5 852.36±327.66abcde 0.25±0.03fgh 19.78±2.36abcd 9.00±1.65bc 86.72±4.25abcdef 6.21±0.64bc 30.99±3.88a 6.21±0.64bc 3.50±0.50cd 1.21±0.15a 2.40±0.34a 2.44±0.40a 7.12±0.94a
10 4 230.00±566.30def 0.35±0.07cdef 12.22±1.24gh 6.42±0.60cde 50.13±2.92h 3.30±0.32h 12.54±1.06ef 3.30±0.32cd 4.70±0.33b 0.44±0.12d 2.20±0.33a 2.00±0.06a 6.26±0.83a
11 5 477.09±696.20abcde 0.21±0.01fgh 10.73±1.31h 6.65±1.15cde 73.63±4.97fg 6.20±0.29bc 16.56±1.09cde 6.20±0.29bc 4.10±0.62bc 0.58±0.11cd 3.30±0.47a 1.68±0.21a 5.92±0.61a
12 5 374.49±411.92abcde 0.34±0.02cedf 14.32±1.78efgh 6.71±0.52cde 99.71±6.25a 4.07±0.34fghi 14.94±0.97def 4.07±0.34bcd 2.50±0.31c 0.47±0.05d 2.70±0.37a 2.51±0.47a 5.62±0.63a
13 6 048.57±455.13abcd 0.46±0.03c 14.57±1.22efgh 8.34±0.53bcd 88.11±4.49abcde 4.35±0.35efghi 17.22±0.91cde 4.35±0.35bcd 2.40±0.16c 0.70±0.10bcd 2.30±0.45a 2.20±0.72a 7.07±0.50a
14 1 964.72±267.56g 0.44±0.06cd 16.18±1.29cdefg 8.91±0.60bc 69.90±4.14g 4.33±0.29efghi 17.03±1.21cde 4.33±0.29bcd 6.20±0.44a 0.60±0.11cd 2.30±0.30a 1.81±0.22a 6.93±0.02a
15 5 533.12±97.35abcde 0.16±0.03h 16.41±1.76cdefg 8.71±0.83bc 91.61±3.66abc 4.55±0.24defghi 18.18±1.34cd 4.55±0.24bcd 5.90±0.35a 0.87±0.07abcd 2.40±0.31a 2.05±0.47a 5.65±0.33a
16 7 086.49±1295.01a 0.72±0.08b 23.87±1.75a 10.25±1.05b 94.45±4.76ab 5.88±0.38bcd 26.60±2.52b 5.88±0.38abc 2.30±0.15c 1.15±0.24ab 2.20±0.33a 1.98±0.43a 7.12±1.41a
17 3 406.27±199.06fg 0.18±0.01gh 15.54±0.54cdefgh 6.72±0.42cde 75.82±3.24defg 4.03±0.27fghi 17.91±1.63cd 4.03±0.27bcd 2.80±0.25c 0.62±0.09cd 2.30±0.30a 3.20±0.75a 5.81±0.45a
18 6 222.38±605.97abc 0.48±0.04c 20.32±2.09abc 9.80±0.49b 85.52±6.29abcdef 4.93±0.42cdefh 17.91±0.67cd 4.93±0.42abc 6.50±0.27a 1.06±0.14abc 2.50±0.34a 1.73±0.28a 5.74±0.71a
19 4 037.28±209.37ef 0.87±0.08a 12.78±1.10gh 4.84±0.84e 56.18±2.18h 3.52±0.42hi 10.30±0.55f 3.52±0.42cd 2.50±0.22c 0.43±0.07d 2.70±0.42a 2.03±0.11a 7.35±0.27a

Table 3

The forage values of different oat varieties"

编号Number 品种Variety NDF(%DM) ADF(%DM) DMI DDM RFV RFQ
1 燕王 54.82±1.92ab 29.73±1.39ab 2.20±0.08ab 65.74±1.08ab 112.14±5.55ab 151.63±10.81ab
2 甜燕麦 54.66±2.22ab 30.14±2.12ab 2.21±0.08ab 65.42±1.65ab 112.18±6.91ab 151.70±13.47ab
3 太阳神 57.24±1.98a 32.17±1.85a 2.10±0.08b 63.84±1.44b 104.16±6.01b 136.07±11.72b
4 青引2号 54.90±1.85ab 29.84±0.81ab 2.19±0.08ab 65.65±0.63ab 111.58±4.94ab 150.53±9.64ab
5 青引1号 49.69±1.31ab 27.66±0.74ab 2.42±0.07ab 67.36±0.58ab 126.54±4.43ab 179.71±8.64ab
6 青燕1号 52.53±2.31ab 28.03±1.83ab 2.30±0.11ab 67.07±1.42ab 119.84±8.10ab 166.65±15.80ab
7 青海444 54.56±1.54ab 29.93±1.32ab 2.20±0.06ab 65.58±1.02ab 112.05±4.49ab 151.45±8.75ab
8 牧王 52.26±2.02ab 28.04±1.36ab 2.30±0.09ab 67.06±1.06ab 119.86±6.52ab 166.67±12.72ab
9 牧乐思 51.73±2.64ab 27.95±1.72ab 2.34±0.12ab 67.13±1.34ab 122.02±8.55ab 170.89±16.67ab
10 魅力 54.05±1.12ab 26.80±1.50ab 2.22±0.05ab 68.03±1.17ab 117.20±3.67ab 161.50±7.16ab
11 美达 53.64±2.41ab 28.41±1.25ab 2.26±0.11ab 66.77±0.97ab 117.08±7.22ab 161.25±14.09ab
12 领袖 53.90±1.34ab 27.42±0.56ab 2.23±0.05ab 67.54±0.44ab 116.74±2.34ab 160.59±4.56ab
13 林纳 53.83±1.26ab 29.47±0.86ab 2.23±0.05ab 65.95±0.67ab 114.13±3.70ab 155.51±7.22ab
14 加燕2号 55.44±4.10ab 28.52±1.82ab 2.19±0.17ab 66.68±1.42ab 113.59±11.63ab 154.45±22.67ab
15 海威 47.77±1.99ab 25.43±1.31b 2.53±0.10ab 69.09±1.02a 135.77±7.47ab 197.70±14.56ab
16 贝勒2 47.20±7.72ab 24.74±4.58b 2.86±0.65a 69.63±3.57a 159.37±45.79a 243.72±89.29a
17 贝勒1 50.05±0.42ab 26.65±0.87ab 2.40±0.02ab 68.14±0.68ab 126.69±2.28ab 179.99±4.46ab
18 白燕7号 52.73±2.11ab 28.21±1.63ab 2.29±0.09ab 66.93±1.27ab 118.91±6.90ab 164.82±13.46ab
19 爱沃 45.53±4.43b 24.16±2.35b 2.69±0.29b 70.08±1.83a 147.06±19.92ab 219.70±38.83ab

Table 4

Equal weighting association and equal weighting coefficient of differents traits of experimental oat varieties"

性状
Trait		 等权关联度
Equal weight
relation		 权重系数
Weighting coefficient		 排序
rank
干草产量Hay yield 0.6181 0.0767 5
叶茎比Leaf-stem ratio 0.4048 0.0502 14
旗叶长Flag leaf length 0.5907 0.0733 6
旗叶宽Flag leaf width 0.5224 0.0648 10
株高Plant height 0.7472 0.0927 2
茎粗Stem diameter 0.4778 0.0593 13
穗长Spike length 0.5269 0.0654 9
穗宽Spike width 0.4779 0.0593 12
小穗数Spikelet number 0.4947 0.0614 11
穗重Panicle weight 0.5596 0.0694 8
分蘖数Tiller number 0.6616 0.0821 3
粗脂肪含量EE content 0.6325 0.0785 4
粗蛋白含量CP content 0.7618 0.0945 1
RFQ 0.5821 0.0722 7

Table 5

Weight association and rank of experimental oat varieties"

编号
Number		 品种
Variety		 加权关联度
Weighted incidence degree		 排序
Rank
1 燕王 0.6346 4
2 甜燕麦 0.6121 5
3 太阳神 0.6000 6
4 青引2号 0.5105 19
5 青引1号 0.5568 15
6 青燕1号 0.5460 18
7 青海444 0.5698 11
8 牧王 0.5675 12
9 牧乐思 0.5816 9
10 魅力 0.5863 8
11 美达 0.7213 2
12 领袖 0.5660 14
13 林纳 0.5810 10
14 加燕2号 0.5555 16
15 海威 0.5975 7
16 贝勒2 0.7486 1
17 贝勒1 0.5498 17
18 白燕7号 0.6363 3
19 爱沃 0.5667 13
[1] 徐文勇, 次仁, 巴桑, 等. 箭筈豌豆在阿里地区的引种试验. 西藏科技, 2013(11): 74,70.
[2] 马艳明, 刘志勇, 白玉亭, 等. 新疆燕麦地方品种资源多样性分析. 新疆农业科学, 2006,43(6):510-513.
[3] 崔海, 王加启, 卜登攀, 等. 燕麦饲料在动物生产中的应用. 中国畜牧兽医, 2010,37(6):214-217.
[4] 徐长林. 高寒牧区不同燕麦品种生长特性比较研究. 草业学报, 2012,21(2):280-285.
doi: 10.11686/cyxb20120236
[5] 巴桑多吉, 扎西平措, 索朗次仁, 等. 阿里地区10个燕麦品种引种试验及生产性能综合评价. 农业科技与信息, 2018(15):73-75,80.
[6] 秦爱琼. 西藏阿里高寒地区燕麦引种栽培试验. 西藏农业科技, 2018,40(4):19-22.
[7] 贺建华. 饲料分析与检测. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2011.
[8] 李志强. 燕麦干草质量评价. 中国奶牛, 2013(19):1-3.
[9] 娜日苏, 梁庆伟, 杨秀芳, 等. 阿鲁科尔沁旗燕麦新品种的灰色关联度评价. 饲料研究, 2019,42(3):83-86.
[10] 邓聚龙. 灰色系统与农业. 山西农业科学, 1985(5):34-37.
[11] 柴继宽, 赵桂琴, 师尚礼. 7个燕麦品种在甘肃二阴区的适应性评价. 草原与草坪, 2011,31(2):1-6.
[12] 崔雄雄, 侯扶江, 常生华, 等. 高寒牧区两个燕麦品种的产量与品质比较. 草业科学, 2018,35(6):1489-1495.
[13] 张光雨, 马和平, 邵小明, 等. 西藏河谷区9个引进燕麦品种的生产性能和营养品质比较研究. 草业学报, 2019,28(5):121-131.
[14] 张光雨, 王江伟, 张豪睿, 等. 西藏日喀则地区8个引进燕麦品种的生产性能和营养品质比较. 草业科学, 2019,36(4):1117-1125.
[15] 王小山, 纪冰沁. 31份燕麦种质主要株型性状比较及遗传分析. 江苏农业科学, 2018,46(22):76-79.
[16] 刘文辉, 颜红波, 周青平, 等. 西宁地区六种燕麦品种比较试验. 青海畜牧兽医杂志, 2005(1):1-2.
[17] 彭先琴, 周青平, 刘文辉, 等. 川西北高寒地区6个燕麦品种生长特性的比较分析. 草业科学, 2018,35(5):1208-1217.
[18] 秦彧, 李晓忠, 姜文清, 等. 西藏主要作物与牧草营养成分及其营养类型研究. 草业学报, 2010,19(5):122-129.
doi: 10.11686/cyxb20100517
[19] 柴继宽, 赵桂琴, 胡凯军, 等. 不同种植区生态环境对燕麦营养价值及干草产量的影响. 草地学报, 2010,18(3):421-425,476.
[20] 周青平, 苟小林, 田莉华, 等. 寒冷区早晚熟燕麦品种的生产性能分析. 科学通报, 2018,63(17):1722-1730.
[21] 南铭, 赵桂琴, 李晶, 等. 西北半干旱区引种燕麦品种产量与品质的关联分析及评价. 草地学报, 2018,26(1):125-133.
[22] 娜日苏, 梁庆伟, 杨秀芳, 等. 13个燕麦品种在科尔沁沙地的生产性能评价. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2018(17):136-141.
[23] 孙建平, 董宽虎, 蒯晓妍, 等. 晋北农牧交错区引进燕麦品种生产性能及饲用价值比较. 草业学报, 2017,26(11):222-230.
[24] 焦金寿, 富新年, 柴继宽. 不同燕麦品种在天祝高寒地区生产性能研究. 畜牧兽医杂志, 2018,37(4):9-12.
[25] 李春喜, 叶润荣, 周玉碧, 等. 高寒牧区不同燕麦品种饲草产量及品质的研究. 草地学报, 2014,22(4):882-888.
doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2014.04.032
[1] Xu Tianjun, Lü Tianfang, Zhao Jiuran, Wang Ronghuan, Cui Tieying, Jia Xiaojun, Zhang Yong, Cai Wantao, Liu Yuee, Liu Xiuzhi, Chen Chuanyong, Wang Yuandong. Study on the Quality of Mechanically Harvested Grain of Maize Variety Jingnongke 728 [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(2): 101-107.
[2] Zhang Wen, Liu Quanyi, Zeng Qingtao, Cai Xiaoli, Feng Yang, Lu Tao. Effects of Different Row Spacings on Boll Characteristics and Fiber Quality of Machine Picked Cotton [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(2): 147-152.
[3] Liu Ping, Shao Caihong, Zhang Honglin, Liu Guangrong. Effects of Dry-Wet Alternate Irrigation on Double Cropping Rice Yield and Quality during Late Development Stage under Seasonal Rain Condition [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(2): 153-159.
[4] Zhou Yuexia, Fan Yu, Ruan Jingjun, Yan Jun, Lai Dili, Peng Yan, Tang Yong, Weng Wenfeng, Cheng Jianping. Correlation Analysis of Oat Grain Nutrition and Agronomic Traits [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(2): 165-172.
[5] Jin Jiangang, Tian Zaifang. Grey Correlation Analysis of Introduced Tartary Buckwheat in the Northern Shanxi [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(2): 52-56.
[6] Yang Yuchen, Du Zhimin, Zhang Xiaopeng, Li Kunyi, Shen Jiaqi, Xu Hai. Effects of Spraying Methyl Jasmonate on Yield and Grain Quality of Japonica Rice during Heading and Flowering Stage [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(2): 71-76.
[7] Wang Dequan, Sun Yanguo, Du Yuhai, Liu Yang, Wang Yi, Ma Xinghua, Zhang Yuqin, Zhang Riqiang. Effects of Transplanting Date and Mode on Growth, Development, Yield and Quality of Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(2): 87-95.
[8] Xu Ning, Zhong Dasen, Wu Changfu. Agricultural Nitrogen Fertilizer Application in Australia and Its Enlightments to Nitrogen Fertilizer Application in China [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(1): 1-6.
[9] Wang Qi, Sun Wen, Wu Junying, Liu Jinghui, Zhao Baoping. Effects of Different Irrigation Amounts and Spraying Humic Acid on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Oat [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(1): 98-103.
[10] Guo Dandan, Liu Zhewen, Chang Xuhong, Wang Demei, Tao Zhiqiang, Wang Yanjie, Yang Yushuang, Zhao Guangcai, Shi Shubing. Effects of Nitrogen Application on Yield and Quality of Wheat with Different Gluten Types [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(6): 158-162.
[11] Zhu Tongquan, Song Quanhao, Meng Xiangfeng. Influences of Various Growth Factors on Yield and Grain Quality in Wheat——Taking Zhumadian’s Wheat Production in the Past Ten Years as Example [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(6): 80-88.
[12] Li Exian, Yin Fuyou, Zhang Dunyu, Chen Yue, Yu Tengqiong, Lei Yongtao, Xiao Suqin, Cheng Zaiquan, Ke Xue. Extraction of High-Quality Chromosome DNA in Yunnan Wild Rice Oryza officinalis [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(5): 103-109.
[13] Liu Wenting, Zhang Xinjun, Yang Cai, Bai Jing, Yang Xiaohong, Zhou Haitao. Analysis of Nutritional Quality Differences and Formation Factors of Naked Oat [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(5): 140-147.
[14] Zhang Xiao, Li Man, Lu Chengbin, Wu Hongya, Jiang Wei, Gao Derong. Review on the Effects of High-Molecular-Weight Glutenin Subunit Deletions on Wheat Quality [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(5): 17-22.
[15] Zheng Di, Wen Chunyan, Shen Xianhua, Hu Biaolin, Che Jüqin, Xiong Yunhua, Wang Zhiquan, Wu Yanshou. Analysis on Variation in Rice Yield Components and Quality at Different Altitudes in Tibet [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(5): 199-203.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[2] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[3] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[4] Yajun Liu,Qiguo Hu,Fengli Chu,Wenjing Wang,Aimei Yang. Effects of Different Cultivation Methods and Planting Densities on the Yield and Storage Root Tuberization of Sweet Potato cv. "Shangshu 9"[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 89 -94 .
[5] Zhengui Yuan,Pingping Chen,Lili Guo,Naimei Tu,Zhenxie Yi. Varietal Difference in Yield and Cd Accumulation and Distribution in Panicle of Rice Affected by Soil Cd Content[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 107 -112 .
[6] Liangmei Chen,Jiangxia Li,Zhaoyun Hu,Wenling Ye,Wenge Wu,Youhua Ma. Review on Application of Low Accumulation Crops on Remediation of Farmland Contaminated by Heavy Metals[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 16 -24 .
[7] Lu Zhao,Zhiwei Yang,Liqun Bu,Ling Tian,Mei Su,Lei Tian,Yinxia Zhang,Shuqin Yang,Peifu Li. Analysis and Comprehensive Evalution of Phenotypic Genetic Diversity of Ningxia and Xinjiang Rice Germplasm[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 25 -34 .
[8] Shanshan Lu,Chenglai Wu,Yan Li,Chunqing Zhang. The Molecular Basis of Holding the Feature and Genetic Purity for Maize Inbred Lines[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 41 -48 .
[9] Leiyue Geng,Wei Zhang,Tuo Zou,Zhenyu Zheng,Lige Geng,Juan Sun,Qixing Zhang. Analysis on Quality Traits Diversity of Rice Landraces in Hebei[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 49 -55 .
[10] Yaoyan Li,Yanyan Pei,Shanyan Huang,Yingyan Zhang,Songji Wei,Yangjiao Xie,Qiong Zhou. Pharmacognosy of Zhongliuteng (Pileostegia tomentella Hand. Mazz) of Yao Medicine[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 61 -65 .