Crops ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1): 49-55.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2018.01.007

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analysis on Quality Traits Diversity of Rice Landraces in Hebei

Geng Leiyue1,2,Zhang Wei1,2,Zou Tuo1,2,Zheng Zhenyu1,2,Geng Lige3,Sun Juan3,Zhang Qixing1,2   

  1. 1 Coastal Agriculture Institute, Hebei Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Tangshan 063299, Hebei, China
    2 Rice Engineering and Technology Center of Tangshan, Tangshan 063000, Hebei, China
    3 Cereal Oil Crop Institute, Hebei Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050035, Hebei, China
  • Received:2017-08-24 Revised:2017-12-06 Online:2018-02-20 Published:2018-08-24

RichHTML

3

PDF (PC)

226

Abstract:

In order to reveal the phenotypic genetic diversity of rice landraces from Hebei Province, diversity index, principal component analysis, clustering analysis were used to assess 15 quality traits genetic diversity of 109 rice landraces. The results indicated that rice landraces from Hebei Province had abundant genetic diversity. The average coefficient of variation was 23.03%, and the average index of diversity was 1.92. The index of diversity of chalky rice rate, chalky area, grain length, amylose content, protein content, hardiness of cooked rice was above 2. The 15 quality traits were concluded into 4 factors by principal component analysis, which accounted for 83.04% information of 15 quality traits. The main factors which affected quality of the rice landrace of Hebei were taste of cooked rice, amylose content, milled rice rate, chalky area. The 109 rice landraces could be divided into 4 categories by using Euclidean Distance System at genetic distance 16.5. The landrace of different geographical source was interlaced distribution. This study provided a scientific basis for the utilization of rice landrace in Hebei Province.

Key words: Rice (Orazy sativa L.), Landraces, Quality, Diversity

Table 1

Number and name of test germplasm"

编号
No.		 种质名称
Germplasm name		 编号
No.		 种质名称
Germplasm name		 编号
No.		 种质名称
Germplasm name		 编号
No.		 种质名称
Germplasm name		 编号
No.		 种质名称
Germplasm name
1 安新大白芒 23 丰宁小白籽 45 涞源大稻子 67 三河红毛水稻 89 邢台汪农1号
2 安新大红芒1 24 丰宁洋稻子 46 临城在来种 68 石家庄红芒稻 90 邢台汪农2号
3 安新大红芒2 25 丰润三百粒 47 灵寿大白灵 69 水原300粒 91 邢台汪农3号
4 安新葡萄黄 26 丰润水粳子 48 卢龙小红芒 70 唐山大稻子 92 邢台汪农4号
5 安新小白芒 27 丰润野地黄金 49 滦平大黄皮 71 唐山竹叶青 93 邢台汪农5号
6 安新银坊 28 抚宁黑芒 50 滦平无名 72 唐县大稻子 94 邢台汪农6号
7 霸县大白芒 29 抚宁黑芒粳子 51 滦平小白籽 73 唐县大老官 95 邢台小芒稻
8 霸县葡萄黄 30 抚宁水原85 52 滦平小黄子 74 唐县小老官 96 邢台叶里藏花
9 白金 31 抚宁唐抚2号 53 滦县小红芒 75 唐县银坊 97 邢台银坊
10 保定小红芒 32 抚宁小白芒 54 满城水稻 76 完县大白芒 98 宣化京租
11 昌黎小红芒1 33 阜平水稻 55 南和小芒稻 77 完县大红芒 99 易县银坊
12 昌黎小红芒2 34 邯郸小沾稻 56 平山小白翎 78 完县大老倌 100 银坊
13 承德大黄毛子 35 行唐西底稻 57 秦皇岛大红芒 79 完县水稻1 101 永年露水白
14 承德黄毛稻子 36 怀安富国稻 58 秦皇岛唐抚1号 80 完县水稻2 102 玉田小白芒
15 承德市鹿尾 37 怀安京租107 59 秦皇岛小白仁 81 文安大白芒 103 张家口和尚头
16 磁县大号稻 38 怀安小稻 60 青龙大白芒1 82 文安葡萄黄 104 正定500粒
17 磁县抗稻 39 获鹿洋稻子 61 青龙大白芒2 83 文安小红芒 105 涿县黄江米
18 磁县在来糯 40 冀粳9号 62 青龙大红芒 84 香河旱稻 106 涿县水原300粒
19 磁县在来一 41 井陉圆稻子 63 青龙旱稻 85 邢台白如意 107 涿县水原85
20 定县江米 42 涞水鹿尾 64 青龙粳子 86 邢台大白芒 108 涿县银坊1
21 丰南红芒稻 43 涞水银坊 65 曲阳大稻 87 邢台大芒稻 109 涿县银坊2
22 丰宁无名 44 涞源本地稻子 66 容城小红芒 88 邢台粳稻

Table 2

Statistical analysis and diversity index of quality traits of Hebei rice landraces"

性状Traits 平均数Mean 标准差Std. 最小值Min 最大值Max 变异系数CV (%) 多样性指数Hi
糙米率BR (%) 78.80 2.50 67.00 83.00 3.17 1.94
精米率MR (%) 67.57 2.94 56.00 74.00 4.35 1.94
整精米率HR (%) 54.61 10.16 31.00 70.00 18.61 1.91
垩白粒率CR (%) 58.19 17.47 15.10 91.47 30.02 2.05
垩白度CD (%) 27.01 13.06 4.33 60.80 48.37 2.06
长宽比LWR 1.71 0.17 1.40 2.10 9.92 1.96
粒长GL (mm) 4.69 0.41 3.67 5.63 8.84 2.04
粒宽GW (mm) 2.75 0.11 2.50 3.03 4.10 1.78
透明度TR (%) 1.91 0.52 0.94 3.27 27.18 1.99
蛋白质含量PC (%) 10.63 1.59 7.30 15.83 14.94 2.06
直链淀粉含量AC (%) 15.23 2.14 7.57 20.77 14.08 1.91
米饭外观 RA 1.68 1.65 0.20 7.52 98.34 1.58
米饭硬度RH 6.68 1.70 1.66 9.80 25.48 2.03
米饭粘度RD 4.34 1.12 3.00 8.50 25.84 1.79
米饭食味值RV 38.26 9.97 30.00 75.16 26.07 1.57

Table 3

Principal component analysis of quality traits"

主成分Prinple PC1 PC2 PC3 PC4
特征值Eigenvalue 4.93 3.39 2.13 2.01
贡献率Proportion 32.86 22.59 14.19 13.40
累计贡献率Cumulative 32.86 55.45 69.64 83.04
特征向量Eigenvectors
糙米率BR 0.33 0.35 0.79 0.05
精米率MR 0.12 0.39 0.87 -0.11
整精米率HR -0.29 0.71 0.36 0.05
垩白粒率CR -0.34 -0.10 -0.07 0.84
垩白度CD -0.28 -0.29 -0.17 0.85
长宽比LWR -0.83 -0.36 0.08 0.10
粒长GL -0.77 -0.24 0.21 0.35
粒宽GW 0.33 0.35 0.25 0.59
透明度TR 0.22 0.81 0.01 -0.08
蛋白质含量PC -0.18 -0.78 -0.39 0.19
直链淀粉含量AC 0.11 0.89 0.26 -0.06
米饭外观RA 0.90 0.18 0.26 -0.12
米饭硬度RH -0.80 0.24 -0.34 0.16
米饭粘度RD 0.89 -0.13 0.15 -0.03
米饭食味值RV 0.89 0.20 0.25 -0.08

Fig.1

Dendrogram of cluster analysis based on factor scores of quality traits"

Table 4

Statistical analysis on the quality traits of 4 groups"

性状
Traits		 Ⅰ(n=31;28.44%) Ⅱ(n=37;33.94%) Ⅲ(n=21;19.27%) Ⅳ(n=20;18.35%)
平均值
Mean		 变异系数(%)
CV		 平均值
Mean		 变异系数(%)
CV		 平均值
Mean		 变异系数(%)
CV		 平均值
Mean		 变异系数(%)
CV
糙米率BR (%) 78.97 1.62 76.62 3.30 80.90 2.03 80.35 1.36
精米率MR (%) 68.29 2.01 64.70 4.02 70.52 2.71 68.65 1.96
整精米率HR (%) 60.26 9.65 45.76 21.41 61.81 9.12 54.65 13.75
长宽比LWR (%) 1.87 6.19 1.72 8.59 1.55 4.02 1.59 7.14
粒长GL (mm) 5.05 5.67 4.66 9.11 4.34 3.14 4.56 7.67
粒宽GW (mm) 2.71 3.81 2.71 3.82 2.79 3.08 2.86 2.96
透明度TR (%) 1.88 23.61 1.60 21.47 2.40 20.03 1.99 27.07
垩白粒率CR (%) 67.50 14.67 58.89 27.57 36.00 31.49 65.73 21.43
垩白度CD (%) 29.76 30.79 31.49 45.28 11.33 41.48 30.91 30.70
蛋白质含量PC (%) 10.51 9.41 11.93 9.72 8.77 7.27 10.38 15.56
直链淀粉含量AC (%) 15.44 9.49 13.64 13.75 17.65 5.19 15.34 12.60
米饭外观RA 0.37 115.60 1.03 105.50 3.22 27.22 3.27 54.71
米饭硬度RH 7.86 11.64 7.13 24.21 5.79 15.10 4.97 29.14
米饭粘度RD 3.48 6.79 4.15 24.04 4.67 11.59 5.67 22.39
米饭食味值RV 30.68 7.14 34.10 17.49 47.45 11.89 48.06 24.18
[1] 程式华, 李建 . 现代中国水稻. 北京: 金盾出版社, 2007: 31-77.
[2] 韩龙植, 黄清港, 盛锦山 , 等. 中国稻种资源农艺性状鉴定、编目和繁种入库概况. 植物遗传资源学报, 2002,3(2):40-45.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1810.2002.02.008
[3] 魏兴华, 汤圣祥, 江云珠 , 等. 中国栽培稻选育品种等位酶多样性及其与形态学性状的相关分析. 中国水稻科学, 2003,17(2):123-128.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7216.2003.02.007
[4] 齐永文, 张冬玲, 张洪亮 , 等. 中国水稻选育品种遗传多样性及其近50年变化趋势. 科学通报, 2006,51(6):693-699.
[5] 杨忠义, 曹永生, 苏艳 , 等. 中国地方粳稻资源特征特性评价及多样性分布. 西南农业学报, 2007,20(5):875-882.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4829.2007.05.001
[6] 张立娜, 曹桂兰, 韩龙植 . 利用SSR标记揭示中国粳稻地方品种遗传多样性. 中国农业科学, 2012,45(3):405-413.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.03.001
[7] 邓宏中, 王彩红, 徐群 , 等. 中国水稻地方品种与选育品种的遗传多样性比较分析. 植物遗传资源学报, 2015,16(3):433-442.
doi: 10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.2015.03.001
[8] 王昊 . 环境与作物选择:唐宋时期河北平原的水稻种植. 中国农史, 2016(3):10-21.
[9] 闫志利, 张启星, 刘国庆 , 等. 河北省地方水(陆)稻品种抗性的研究. 河北职业技术师范学院学报, 1999,13(3):5-10.
[10] 张启星, 王永新, 张秀和 , 等. 河北省地方水(陆)稻品种耐逆性研究. 中国农学通报, 2005,21(6):176-178.
[11] 张启星, 张晓东, 王秀萍 , 等. 河北省地方水(陆)稻品种品质性状评价及相关性研究. 华北农学报, 2004,19(增刊):27-32.
[12] 国家数据统计局数据中心,.
[13] Bao J S . Genes and QTLs for rice grain quality improvement.//Rice-Germplasm, Genetics and Improvement, 2014: 239-278.
doi: 10.1002/sim.5642
[14] 中华人民共和国农业部标准NY/T593-2002,食用稻品种品质. 北京:中国标准出版社, 2002: 1-4.
[15] 张洪亮, 李自超, 曹永生 , 等. 表型水平上检验水稻核心种质的参数比较. 作物学报, 2003,29(2):252-257.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2003.02.016
[16] 耿雷跃, 马佳, 张薇 , 等. 河北水稻育成品系品质性状及相关性分析. 中国稻米, 2016,22(S1):11-13.
[17] 曾亚文, 李自超, 申时全 , 等. 云南地方稻种的多样性及优异种质研究. 中国水稻科学, 2001,15(3):169-174.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7216.2001.03.003
[18] 李自超, 张洪亮, 曾亚文 , 等. 云南稻种资源表型遗传多样性的研究. 作物学报, 2001,27(6):832-837.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2001.06.023
[19] 金伟栋, 洪德林 . 太湖流域粳稻地方品种遗传多样性研究. 生物多样性, 2006,14(6):479-487.
doi: 10.1360/biodiv.060189
[20] 沈新平, 沈明星, 龚丽萍 , 等. 太湖地区晚粳地方种稻米RVA谱特征多样性分析. 作物学报, 2006,32(12):1902-1908.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2006.12.021
[21] 沈新平, 沈明星, 顾丽 , 等. 太湖流域晚粳稻地方种资源的表型遗传多样性. 生态学报, 2007,27(1):189-196.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2007.01.022
[22] 陈峰, 朱其松, 徐建第 , 等. 山东地方水稻品种的农艺性状与品质性状的多样性分析. 植物遗传资源学报, 2012,13(3):393-397,405.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1810.2012.03.011
[23] 陈雨, 陈建酉, 潘大建 , 等. 广东省地方稻种品质性状表型多样性及其形成的生态因子分析. 植物遗传资源学报, 2013,14(3):462-471.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3466.2008.04.006
[24] 何晓群 , 多元统计分析(第四版). 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2015: 152-174.
[25] 陈能, 罗玉坤, 谢黎虹 , 等. 我国水稻品种的蛋白质含量及与米质的相关性研究. 作物学报, 2006,8(32):1193-1196.
[26] 王忠, 顾蕴洁, 陈刚 , 等. 稻米的品质和影响因素. 分子植物育种, 2003,2(1):231-241.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-416X.2003.02.011
[1] Ma Mengli, Zheng Yun, Zhou Xiaomei, . Genetic Diversity Analysis of Red Rice from#br# Hani’s Terraced Fields in Yunnan Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 21-26.
[2] Zhao Xin, Chen Shaofeng, Wang Hui, . Research on the Yield and Quality of Different Tartaty#br# Buckwheat Varieties in Northern Shanxi Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 27-32.
[3] Wang Fengfeng, Wang Ping, Chen Li, . Analysis of Morphological Diversity Based on#br# Botanical Traits in Seed-Used Pumpkin Germplasms [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 77-84.
[4] Li Shaokun, Zhang Wanxu, Wang Keru, Han Dongsheng, . Study on Maize Mechanical Grain#br# Harvest in Northern Xinjiang [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 127-131.
[5] Gao Wenjun, Yang Guoyi, Gao Xinzhong, Yu Zhu, . The Effects of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, or Potassium#br# Fertilizer on the Yield and Silage Quality of Maize [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 144-149.
[6] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143-148.
[7] Huiqin Wen,Tianling Cheng,Ziyou Pei,Xue Li,Lisheng Zhang,Mei Zhu. Analysis of Comprehensive Characteristics of Wheat Varieties Registered in Shanxi Province in Recent Years [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 32-36.
[8] Wen Zhang,Tao Lu,Yuxia Ye,Quanyi Liu,Yang Feng. Studies on the Effect of Mixed Defoliant on Cotton in Kuitun District, Xinjiang [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 103-107.
[9] Zhiqiang Tang,Liqiang Dong,Rui Li,Liying Zhang,Na He,Yuedong Li. Effects of Nitrogen and Soil Type on Seedling Quality and Nutrient Absorption in Rice [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 141-147.
[10] Huiyao Tian,Jizhi Jiang,Chengbin Li,Fen Shen,Ning Hou. Genetic Diversity of Phytophthora infestans in Northeast China [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 168-173.
[11] Jingjing Yang,Jianglu Chen,Ruizhi Xie,Xiaowei Zhang,Bianhong Ding,Xinming Wu,Shaokun Li,Dongfang Li. Effects of Seed Weight Difference on the Evenness of Related Germination Indexes in Maize [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 180-184.
[12] Yaning Wang,Jinpeng Yang,Chunlei Yang,Fangsen Xu,Xiang Zhang,Liang Li. Effects of Well-Cellar Transplanting with Triangulation on Growth, Development,Yield and Quality of Burley Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 116-122.
[13] Lili Zhang,Yizhou Zhao,Xin Li,Ting Mao,Yan Liu,Zhan Zhang,Shanjun Ni,Fucai Liu. Mutant Analysis on Quality Trait of Different Japonica Rice Progenies Induced by 60Co-γ Ray Irradiation [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 51-56.
[14] Zhibo Zhou,Yake Yi,Guanghui Chen. Effects of Sowing Amount, Medium and Chemical Treatment on Seedling Quality and Yield of High Quality Late-Rice Variety of Yuzhenxiang [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 129-135.
[15] Huijuan Tang,Gonggu Zang,Chaohua Cheng,Qing Tang,Yujun Li,Lining Zhao. Correspondence Analysis of Yield and Quality Traits of Industrial Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 52-55.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .