Crops ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 150-159.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2021.01.021

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Nitrogen and Nitrogen Forms on Photosynthetic Fluorescence Parameters of Chlorophyll in Flue-Cured Tobacco Leaves

Huang Dan1(), Yang Fuwen1, Liu Lin2, Wang Yue1, He Guoqiang2, Wang Hongrui1, Sun Guangyu1, Ao Hong1()   

  1. 1College of Life Sciences, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, Heilongjiang, China
    2Mudanjiang Institute of Tobacco Sciences, Harbin 150076, Heilongjiang, China
  • Received:2020-07-13 Revised:2020-10-28 Online:2021-02-15 Published:2021-02-23
  • Contact: Ao Hong E-mail:2018120877@nefu.edu.cn;aohong2003@163.com

Abstract:

To explore the effects of nitrogen application and nitrogen forms on the photosynthetic capacity of flue-cured tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) seedlings and to provide a scientific basis for rational application of nitrogen fertilizers to flue-cured tobacco, the two varieties of tobacco Longjiang911 and Longjiang0520 in the absence of N (CK), nitrate nitrogen (NO3--N), ammonium nitrogen (NH4+-N), and ammonium nitrate mixed nitrogen (NO3--N:NH4+-N=1:1) processing the photosynthetic gas exchange parameters and the changing rule of the fluorescence kinetics curve was studied. The results showed that the net photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs) and transpiration rate (Tr) of the nitrogen treatments were higher than those of CK, and with the extension of the cultivation time, the increase range was increased, and the difference was reached up to a significant level (P < 0.05). Nitrogen application generally increased Fv/Fm and PIabs of the two flue-cured tobacco varieties, indicating that nitrogen promoted the activity of PSⅡ reaction centers in flue-cured tobacco seedling leaves; at the same time, nitrogen application reduced VJ and VI. The comparison of fluorescence parameters under three different nitrogen forms showed that the fluorescence parameters Fv/Fm and PIabs of flue-cured tobacco leaves treated by NH4+-N were relatively lower, while VJ and VI were relatively higher, indicating that NH4+-N was relatively weak in improving the photosynthetic performance of PSⅡ. By combining both photosynthetic gas exchange parameters and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, it could be seen that photosynthetic performances of Longjiang911 treated with NO3--N and Longjiang0520 treated with NO3--N:NH4+-N (1:1) were better.

Key words: Nitrogen form, Flue-cured tobacco, Rapid fluorescence kinetics curve

Table 1

Principal component ratio and number of moles of nitrate nitrogen and ammonium nitrogen nutrient solution under different treatments mmol/L"

营养液主要成分
Nutrient solution
principal component
NO3--N∶NH4+-N
0∶0
(CK)
100∶0
(T1)
0∶100
(T2)
50∶50
(T3)
Ca(NO3)2 0.000 0.500 0.000 0.375
KNO3 0.000 0.500 0.000 0.000
(NH4)2SO4 0.000 0.000 0.750 0.375
K2SO4 0.250 0.000 0.250 0.250
CaSO4 1.000 0.000 1.000 0.125
MgSO4 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000

Table 2

Effects of different nitrogen forms on photosynthetic gas parameters of leaves of two flue-cured tobacco varieties"

品种
Variety
处理
Treatment
Pn [μmol/(m2·s)] Tr [mmol/(m2·s)] Gs [mol/(m2·s)] Ci (μmol/mol)
处理后15d 处理后30d 处理后15d 处理后30d 处理后15d 处理后30d 处理后15d 处理后30d
LJ911 CK 5.19±0.33d 2.04±0.22d 2.99±0.24d 0.66±0.04c 0.10±0.01d 0.02±0.00d 348.87±5.93abc 313.78±35.04b
T1 9.61±0.97b 12.15±0.38a 5.48±0.34a 3.58±0.35a 0.31±0.03a 0.33±0.03a 379.20±8.37a 333.78±14.97ab
T2 5.09±0.28d 5.49±0.56c 0.92±0.10ef 3.03±0.33b 0.06±0.01e 0.24±0.03c 336.07±19.64bc 362.33±21.02a
T3 7.35±0.74c 8.65±0.84b 3.91±0.40c 3.68±0.33a 0.12±0.01c 0.27±0.03bc 361.00±39.38ab 339.17±16.54ab
LJ0520 CK 1.84±0.16e 0.45±0.04e 0.58±0.05f 0.18±0.02d 0.02±0.00f 0.01±0.00d 333.27±12.68bc 355.11±27.01a
T1 2.48±0.26e 9.08±0.90b 1.10±0.13e 3.50±0.37a 0.03±0.00ef 0.27±0.03bc 316.60±11.38c 354.49±12.37a
T2 5.83±0.31d 2.63±0.11d 1.31±0.13e 0.69±0.02c 0.06±0.01e 0.03±0.00d 383.20±39.33a 273.36±8.55c
T3 11.36±1.08a 11.82±1.10a 4.45±0.43b 3.85±0.29a 0.24±0.10b 0.28±0.02b 337.47±9.36bc 312.62±12.25b

Fig.1

Effects of different nitrogen forms on OJIP curves of leaves of two flue-cured tobacco varieties Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments of the same measurement (P < 0.05)"

Fig.2

Effects of different nitrogen forms on the relative variable fluorescence intensity of standardized J and I points in two flue-cured tobacco leaves"

Fig.3

The influence of different nitrogen forms on PSⅡ photochemical activities of leaves of two flue-cured tobacco varieties"

Fig.4

Effects of different nitrogen forms on the relative variable fluorescence intensity at point K and point L of leaves of two flue-cured tobacco"

Table 3

Correlation analysis result of gas exchange parameters and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters"

参数Parameter Pn Gs Ci Tr Fv/Fm PIabs Fo Fm
Pn -1
Gs -0.899** -1
Ci -0.466 -0.447 -1
Tr -0.871** -0.943** -0.456 -1
Fv/Fm -0.499 -0.559 -0.863** -0.506 -1
PIabs -0.690 -0.684 -0.766* -0.711* -0.799* 1
Fo -0.452 -0.520 -0.137 -0.422 -0.114 0.346 1
Fm -0.616 -0.664 -0.126 -0.574 -0.155 0.592 0.959** 1
[1] 赵军. 不同氮源与用量对烟草生长及土壤养分的影响. 泰安:山东农业大学, 2013.
[2] 程元强, 袁球, 周华凤, 等. 不同类型烟草光合特性的比较研究. 江西农业大学学报, 2014,36(3):489-494.
[3] 史万华, 李栋烈, 朱家明, 等. 烤烟新品种引种试验初报. 中国烟草科学, 2003(2):29-31.
[4] 陈荣平, 邱恩建, 宋宝刚, 等. 烤烟新品种龙江911的选育及特征特性. 中国烟草科学, 2002(4):23-27.
[5] 刘挺. 不同形态氮肥配比对会理烤烟生长发育和品质的影响. 湖南农业科学, 2018(5):49-52.
[6] 周方舟, 向铁军, 陈裕新, 等. 氮肥形态配比对烤烟生长和品质的影响. 湖南农业科学, 2018(1):37-39,44.
[7] 邢瑶. 氮素形态对烟苗生长及其生理生化特性的影响. 北京:中国农业科学院, 2016.
[8] 杨兵丽, 张国斌, 周箬涵, 等. 不同形态氮素配施对娃娃菜光合和叶绿素荧光特性的影响. 浙江农业学报, 2015,27(5):761-768.
[9] 李小龙. 不同氮素形态及配比对蔬菜光合特性和品质的影响. 中国园艺文摘, 2015,31(4):57-58,6.
[10] 叶义全, 罗红艳, 李茂, 等. 氮素形态对杉木幼苗侧根生长和叶片光合特性的影响. 西北植物学报, 2018,38(11):2036-2044.
[11] 金微微, 张会慧, 李鑫, 等. 小黑杨和桑树叶片光合特性对不同氮素形态的响应. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2018,38(5):98-103.
[12] 黄化刚, 申燕, 吴飞跃, 等. 不同氮素来源对烤烟上部叶碳氮代谢及其基因表达的影响. 南方农业学报, 2018,49(3):462-468.
[13] 李得瑞, 罗映虹, 周冀衡, 等. 氮肥形态对烟草生理活性及钾吸收的影响. 湖南农业科学, 2014(22):40-42.
[14] 张杰, 黄海棠, 杨立均, 等. 氮素形态对烟草生长及品质影响的研究进展. 中国农学通报, 2018,34(15):38-43.
[15] 王玉霞. 低温条件下氮素形态对烤烟生理代谢及产量和品质的影响. 福州:福建农林大学, 2016.
[16] 肖艳松, 钟权, 李宏光, 等. 几种不同氮源配比营养液对烟苗生长发育及生理特性的影响. 西南农业学报, 2016,29(5):1086-1090.
[17] 樊红柱, 曾祥忠, 顾会战, 等. 氮肥形态及运筹对烤烟产量与品质的影响. 西南农业学报, 2016,29(4):879-882.
[18] 张梦, 梁永江, 张长华, 等. 不同氮源对烤烟漂浮育苗氮素利用及烟苗生长的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2012,18(1):139-145.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2012.11125
[19] 吴成林, 曹景林, 黄文昌, 等. 不同白肋烟品种净光合速率与烟叶质量比较及相关性分析. 作物研究, 2018,32(5):411-414.
[20] Funk J L, Cornwell W K. Leaf traits within communities:context may affect the mapping of traits to function. Ecology, 2013,94(9):1893-1897.
doi: 10.1890/12-1602.1 pmid: 24279259
[21] 刘曙光, 段佩玲, 张利霞, 等. 氮素形态对‘凤丹’表型性状、光合及产量的影响. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019,43(4):161-168.
[22] 王晓琳. 氮素水平对烟草幼苗叶片光合特性的影响. 北京:中国农业科学院, 2019.
[23] 张景波, 张金鑫, 卢琦, 等. 乌兰布和沙漠油蒿叶片PSⅡ叶绿素荧光动力学参数及其光响应曲线动态. 草业科学, 2019,36(3):713-719.
[24] 朱弘, 温国胜. 不同竹龄毛竹冠层叶片PSⅡ叶绿素荧光特性的比较. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2017,37(1):12-19.
[25] 尹华军. 增温对川西亚高山针叶林不同光环境下几种幼苗生长的影响. 成都:中国科学院研究生院(成都生物研究所), 2007.
[26] 贺国强, 张会慧, 金微微, 等. 水氮互作下烤烟幼苗叶片的PSⅡ功能研究. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2016,42(1):39-43.
[27] 孟祥馨悦, 刘丰, 崔宇婷, 等. 低氮条件下施用不同形态氮素对谷子幼苗叶片叶绿素荧光特性的影响. 华北农学报, 2017,32(S1):272-278.
[28] 李鹏民, 高辉远, Strasser R J. 快速叶绿素荧光诱导动力学分析在光合作用研究中的应用. 植物生理与分子生物学学报, 2005,31(6):559-566.
[29] 许楠, 钟海秀, 沙威, 等. 不同氮素形态配比对饲料桑幼苗叶片叶绿素荧光特性和能量分配的影响. 中国农学通报, 2015,31(26):18-25.
[1] Zhang Yunping, Guo Shanhu, Zhang Jintao, Xie Yan, Yi Ke, Li Qiang. The Relationship between Trace Elements in Tobacco Leaves and Soil pH in Qujing [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(2): 178-182.
[2] Wang Dequan, Sun Yanguo, Du Yuhai, Liu Yang, Wang Yi, Ma Xinghua, Zhang Yuqin, Zhang Riqiang. Effects of Transplanting Date and Mode on Growth, Development, Yield and Quality of Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(2): 87-95.
[3] Zhou Jiang, Xie Yizhang, Xiang Ping'an. Emergy Analysis of Inputs and Outputs of Major Field Crop Ecosystems in Hunan Province [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(1): 175-181.
[4] Li Diqin, Wang Qing, Hu Yajie, Wang Yan, Wang Yanni, Zhong Yi, Liu Minghui, Ding Chunxia. Study on Tolerance of Xiangyan 5 to Cadmium in Tobacco-Growing Soil [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(1): 182-186.
[5] Guo Xiaoheng, Wei Shuoguo, Wang Xiaoli, Xu Rui, Han Dan, Xu Zicheng. Effects of Different Types of Mulch Film and Irrigation Methods at Seedling Stage on Growth and Development of Tobacco in Xiangyang Mountain Area [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(5): 154-163.
[6] Shen Hongtao,Zhang Fusheng,Li Dong,Qiu Jianhua,Cai Xinghong,Qin Yubao. Effects of Different Preceding Crops and Planting Density on Yield and Quality of Flue-Cured Tobacco in Mudanjiang [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 105-111.
[7] Shuai Jingtong,Pei Xiaodong,Li Juan,Zhang Yiyang. Effects of Furrowing and Ridging Measures on the Quality of Tobacco-Planting Soils and Output Value of Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(6): 114-119.
[8] Jiang Nan,Gong Zhanwu,Chen Lili,Hu Yajie,Wei Jianyu,Wang Shengcai,Li Diqin. Grey Correlation Analysis Between Soil Nutrients and Three Microorganisms after Application of Bacillus subtilis [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 142-149.
[9] Xinling Yang,Qian Yao,Wenli Ping,Yiqiong Ma,Baolin Wang,Guotao Jia,Yongfeng Yang,Hong Cui. Screening of High Aroma Mutants from Progenies of EMS Mutagenized Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 68-74.
[10] Siyu Gong,Sirong Zhong,Shichuan Zhang,Yaping Nie,Xihuan Liang,Shuaiqiang Yang,Qiyuan Liu. Effects of Biochar on Growth, Yield and Quality of Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 154-160.
[11] Jie Xu,Lei Pan,Shuai Yang,Yunsong Chen,Shengbin Deng,Xiaodong Yang,Wenguang Ma. Analysis of Genetic Effects of Potassium Content in Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 30-34.
[12] Linjian Dai,Wu Chen,Tian Zhou,Jun Zhong. Selection Mutant of Resistant to Black Shank on Tobacco by Anther Culture [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 66-70.
[13] Han Yan,Hanglin Song,Li Zhang,Jing Yan,Xianji Shi,Shimiao Zhu,Lu Liu,Hulin Li. Effects of Cadmium Stress on Agronomic Traits and Physiological and Biochemical Indexes of Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(5): 156-161.
[14] Kaiyu Li,Zhanxiang Sun,Ning Yang,Jiaming Zheng,Zhichuang Zhu,Jibing Xiao,Liangshan Feng,Chuang Lu. Effects of Topdressing Different Forms of Nitrogen on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Maize with Drip Irrigation under Plastic Film [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(2): 93-97.
[15] Qingli Liu,Zhihong Li,Yanli Xu,Junying Li,Yungui Zhang. Research on the Cooperative Technology of Flue-Cured Tobacco based on Transplanting-Date, Fertilization and Variety in Yunnan [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(6): 128-134.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[2] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[3] Yuan Wang,Ze Guo,Xiaohui Li,Shixiao Xu,Xuexia Xing,Siqi Zhang,Jia He,Chao Liu,Fang Chen,Tiezhao Yang. Effects of Meloidogyne incognita Infection on Tobacco Root System under Different Temperatures[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 161 -166 .
[4] Jingwen Fang,Yan Wu,Zhihua Liu. Effects of Salt Stress on Seed Germination and Physiological Characteristics of Apocynum venetum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 167 -174 .
[5] Chengxun Li,Aiping Li,Xiaoyu Xu,Kaibin Zheng. Discussion on the Mechanism of Stress Resistance of Pigeonpea and Application Prospect in Fujian Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 28 -31 .
[6] Xingchuan Zhang, Wenxuan Huang, Kuanyu Zhu, Zhiqin Wang, Jianchang Yang. Effects of Nitrogen Rates on the Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Agronomic Traits of Different Rice Cultivars[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 69 -78 .
[7] Mingcong Zhang,Yingce Zhan,Songyu He,Xijun Jin,Mengxue Wang,Chunyuan Ren,Yuxian Zhang. Effects of Different Nitrogen Fertilizer and Density Level on Dry Matter Accumulation and Yield of Adzuki Bean[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 141 -146 .
[8] Chunlei Wang,Zhijun Fang,Yanrui Xu,Xiaoping Lu,Chunhua Mu,Kai Shan,Lujiang Hao. Effects of Starane on the Community Diversity of Maize Root Endophytes Analyzed Using High-Throughput Sequencing Technology[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 160 -165 .
[9] Yanfang Hao,Liangqun Wang,Yong Liu,Wei Zhang,Wei Yang,Hongyan Bai,Bo Wu. Establishment of Sorghum Cell Suspensions with Young Leaves[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 35 -40 .
[10] Wei Zhang,Liangqun Wang,Yong Liu,Yanfang Hao,Wei Yang,Hongyan Bai,Bo Wu. Optimization of the Factors Related to the Efficiency of Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation of Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 56 -61 .